mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: crow@old-fsckful.ath.cx (Andreas Happe)
To: Michal Ludvig <michal@logix.cz>
Cc: Andreas Happe <andreashappe@flatline.ath.cx>,
	James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
	cryptoapi@lists.logix.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cryptoapi/sysfs] display cipher details in sysfs
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:35:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040907143509.GA30920@old-fsckful.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0409061847000.25698@maxipes.logix.cz>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 1683 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 08:49:30PM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> I really like the patch - I wanted to do quite the same so thanks that you
> saved me some work ;-)

thanks ;).

> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Andreas Happe wrote:
> > the attached patch creates a /sys/cryptoapi/<cipher-name>/ hierarchie

BTW: the latest incarnation of the patch uses /sys/class/crypto/<cipher-name>.

> I'd prefer to have the algorithms grouped by "type" ("cipher", "digest",
> "compress")? Then the apps could easily see only the algos that thay are
> interested in...

jup, but the seqfile code in proc.c would get a lot more uglier. If we could
drop proc.c this wouldn´t be a problem.

> There could eventually be a separate crypto/sysfs.c, couldn't?

check the patch ;). There's already a sysfs.c with the sysfs-centric
stuff.

> Few notes:
> - - some algorithms allow only discrete set of keysizes (e.g. AES can do
> 128b, 192b and 256b). Can we instead of min/max have a file 'keysize' with
> either:
> 	minsize-maxsize
> or
> 	size1,size2,size3
> ?
> 
> - - ditto for blocksize?

how would you implement this in the crypto_alg struture? The sysfs/procfs
integration isn't that problem.

> - - With the future support for hardware crypto accelerators it
> might be possible to have more modules loaded providing the same
> algorithm. They may have different priorities and one would be treated as
> "default". Then I expect the syntax of 'module' file to change from a
> simple module name to something like:
> 	# modname:prio:type:whatever
> 	aes:0:generic:
> 	aes_i586:1:optimized:
> 	padlock:2:hardware:default

Isn't this against the "one value per file" - sysfs rule.

> Michal Ludvig

	--Andreas

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-07 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040831175449.GA2946@final-judgement.ath.cx>
     [not found] ` <Xine.LNX.4.44.0409010043020.30561-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
2004-09-01  8:28   ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-06  0:04     ` Greg KH
2004-09-07 16:37       ` James Morris
2004-09-07 16:45         ` Greg KH
2004-09-07 16:47         ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-07 16:52           ` Greg KH
2004-09-06 18:49     ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-07 14:35       ` Andreas Happe [this message]
2004-09-07 15:49         ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-07 16:57           ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-10 11:21             ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-10 10:55           ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-27  8:41             ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-27  9:10               ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-28 12:34                 ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-29  9:36                   ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-29  9:37                     ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-29 14:13                     ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-29 13:13                   ` Michal Ludvig
2004-09-27 15:53               ` James Morris
2004-09-28 12:21                 ` [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/2] cryptoapi: update sysfs-patch Andreas Happe
2004-09-28 12:23                   ` [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 2/2] cryptoapi: make /proc/crypto optional Andreas Happe
2004-09-28 14:32                     ` Sven Schuster
2004-09-29  8:40                       ` Andreas Happe
2004-09-07 16:36       ` [cryptoapi/sysfs] display cipher details in sysfs James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040907143509.GA30920@old-fsckful.ath.cx \
    --to=crow@old-fsckful.ath.cx \
    --cc=andreashappe@flatline.ath.cx \
    --cc=cryptoapi@lists.logix.cz \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal@logix.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®