From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266491AbUIISZS (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:25:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266508AbUIISYM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:24:12 -0400 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77]:47011 "EHLO pimout1-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266526AbUIISJP (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:09:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:09:03 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Jakob Oestergaard , Nathan Scott , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Major XFS problems... Message-ID: <20040909180903.GA8119@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20040908123524.GZ390@unthought.net> <20040909074046.A3958243@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040908232210.GL390@unthought.net> <20040909094255.F3951028@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040909121100.GN390@unthought.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040909121100.GN390@unthought.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote: > A google for 'debug.c:106' turns out some 120 results - it seems that no > special magic is needed, other than a few boxes to set up the test > scenario. linux/fs/xfs/support/debuc.c: 84 void 85 cmn_err(register int level, char *fmt, ...) 86 { [...] 105 if (level == CE_PANIC) 106 BUG(); 107 } Using cmn_err with CE_PANIC will show up as this, so it's likely your google search is showing multiple different bugs, many of which have been fixed. You need to check the stack traces to see if they are the same. --cw