mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Axelle Apvrille <axelle.apvrille@trusted-logic.fr>,
	serue@us.ibm.com, david.gordon@ericsson.com, gaspoucho@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.3.1: kernel module for run-time authentication of binaries
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:45:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909214507.GA29412@escher.cs.wm.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040909140349.C1924@build.pdx.osdl.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 832 bytes --]

> Thing is, x86 makes no distinction btween r/x so, have you tried mmaping
> with read, then executing (I haven't)?

Yup, clearly that will work on x86.  And so obviously DigSig is not
a solution to format and buffer overflows  :)  Nor, unfortunately, a
solution to code which for whatever reason exploited this behavior.

> This has nothing to do with file permissions aside of read.  All you need
> is read permission, then you can mmap(PROT_EXEC) which will kick off the
> check, and do deny_write_access.  It's a freeform way to lock writers
> out of any readable file in the system.

No, not "any readable file," because DigSig will not lock non-ELF files.

The attached patch adds a check for execute permission to the file being
mmap'ed.  Failing such permission, it will return -EPERM and not lock
the file.

thanks,
-serge

[-- Attachment #2: digsig.c.noexec.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]

--- digsig.c	2004-09-09 17:43:51.342757952 -0500
+++ digsig.c.noexec	2004-09-09 17:43:43.569939600 -0500
@@ -556,6 +556,11 @@ int dsi_file_mmap(struct file * file, un
 		goto out_file_no_buf;
 	}
 
+	if (!(file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mode & MAY_EXEC)) {
+		retval = -EPERM;
+		goto out_with_file;
+	}
+
 	retval = DIGSIG_MODE;
 
 	size = elf_ex->e_shnum * sizeof(Elf32_Shdr);

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-09 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-09 15:55 Makan Pourzandi
2004-09-09 16:24 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 17:23   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-09-09 17:42     ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 18:43       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-09-09 17:31   ` Makan Pourzandi
2004-09-09 17:55     ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 19:05       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-09-09 20:40         ` Makan Pourzandi
2004-09-09 21:03           ` Chris Wright
2004-09-09 21:45             ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2004-09-10 21:28               ` Chris Wright
2004-09-10 20:53             ` Makan Pourzandi
2004-09-10 21:26               ` Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040909214507.GA29412@escher.cs.wm.edu \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=axelle.apvrille@trusted-logic.fr \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=david.gordon@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gaspoucho@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®