mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1-mm3 lockmeter on 512p w/kernbench
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:25:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040910162527.GA27541@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408201404.32515.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:04:32PM -0400, Jesse Barnes wrote:
| More lockstats.  dcache is obviously still there, but for some reason the rcu 
| stuff is gone (I didn't apply Manfred's patches).  I must have done some 
| stuff prior to collecting the lockstat data last time that caused it.

...[snip]...

| SPINLOCKS         HOLD            WAIT
|   UTIL  CON    MEAN(  MAX )   MEAN(  MAX )(% CPU)     TOTAL NOWAIT SPIN RJECT  NAME
| 
|         3.1%  2.2us( 102ms)   12ms( 488ms)(35.1%) 320195677 96.9%  3.1% 0.00%  *TOTAL*

...[snip]...

|  31.2% 95.2%   71us(  10ms)   37ms( 146ms)(30.2%)   2828650  4.8% 95.2%    0%  rcu_check_quiescent_state+0xf0

Looks like the RCU contention is still there.

I ran some bench marks at 512p on a 2.6.5 SUSE kernel with and without
Manfred's patches 4 and 5 added (the SUSE kernel already has the 3
accepted RCU patches), and the results were very promising.  I think
we'll want to pursue getting these other two RCU patches accepted.

I'll to get some lockmeter numbers on a latest -mm kernel next week.

Greg

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-10 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-20 10:19 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-20 11:25 ` [PATCH] 2.6.8.1-mm3, fix visws kernel build Andrey Panin
2004-08-20 11:46 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Russell King
2004-08-20 11:47 ` [PATCH] 2.6.8.1-mm3, fix qla1280 build on visws Andrey Panin
2004-08-20 15:44 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 16:57   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 17:08     ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 18:55     ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-20 19:56       ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 20:02       ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20 23:31         ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Anton Blanchard
2004-08-21  0:03           ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21  7:04             ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-21 15:22             ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 19:59         ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21 20:24           ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 20:35             ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23  9:02         ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 David Mosberger
2004-08-23 16:27           ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 wli
2004-08-23 18:18             ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-24  7:24             ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 David Mosberger
2004-08-20 18:04   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 lockmeter on 512p w/kernbench Jesse Barnes
2004-09-10 16:25     ` Greg Edwards [this message]
2004-08-20 18:46   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21  1:26   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-21 20:05     ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-22  1:27       ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-22  2:11         ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 15:44           ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 17:38 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 (build failture w/ CONFIG_NUMA) mita akinobu
2004-08-20 17:55   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 18:12 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-08-21 18:54   ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-08-21 17:37 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-22 13:02   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 18:51 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 R. J. Wysocki
2004-08-22  4:32 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Thomas Davis
2004-08-22  4:48   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-22  4:58     ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-22  6:26       ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Thomas Davis
2004-08-22  6:51     ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Pete Zaitcev
2004-08-22 15:11   ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040910162527.GA27541@sgi.com \
    --to=edwardsg@sgi.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome