From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267852AbUIJT1Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:27:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267831AbUIJT1Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:27:24 -0400 Received: from mail1.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.201]:47319 "EHLO mail1.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267850AbUIJTZD (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:25:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:24:59 -0700 Message-Id: <200409101924.i8AJOxRH029788@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Chris Wright Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sigqueue accounting for posix-timers broken by new RLIMIT_SIGPENDING tracking code In-Reply-To: Chris Wright's message of Friday, 10 September 2004 10:42:28 -0700 <20040910104228.K1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> Emacs: anything free is worth what you paid for it. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org D'oh. You are right. I misread the code in the middle of the night. I came across the new issue of hitting the sigpending limit while verifying a test case for timers leaking. I failed to realize that it's the timer leak itself that translates into a sigpending count leak. Indeed, ignore that patch, and wait for the posix-timers leak fix coming soon. Thanks, Roland