From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268026AbUIJXR6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:17:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268014AbUIJXR6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:17:58 -0400 Received: from web40004.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.78.22]:57963 "HELO web40004.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268026AbUIJXR3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:17:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20040910231728.62214.qmail@web40004.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:17:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Song Wang Subject: Routing Performance Comparison between 2.4 and 2.6 kernel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm looking for the network packet routing performance comparison between the latest 2.4 and 2.6 kernel. I did some initial testing on my mips-based router. 2.6 kernel performed way below 2.4 kernel. It sucks. Turning on preemption on 2.6 kernel even makes routing performance worse. Anybody did a comprehensive study on the routing performance for 2.6 and 2.4 kernel? Thanks. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool