From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262418AbUILVXB (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:23:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262574AbUILVXB (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:23:01 -0400 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.51]:5544 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262279AbUILVWr (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:22:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:22:44 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Alan Cox Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/m68k , Debian GNU/Linux m68k , uClinux list , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: `new' syscalls for m68k Message-ID: <20040912212244.GC24240@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux/m68k , Debian GNU/Linux m68k , uClinux list , Linux Kernel Development References: <1094852893.18235.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1094852893.18235.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? > Not really > > > - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are > > missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other > > method for Thread Local Storage? > > Up to your implementation > > > - What about sys_vserver()? I would be happy to add a syscall reservation to the list of already reserved syscalls for i386, x86_64, s390, sparc/64, sh3/4, ppc/64 and mips * ... > Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other > security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one > assumes would do likewise) sorry, SELinux and friends can and do not even remotely implement the same functionality, and linux-vserver for 2.6 is working fine ... best, Herbert > > - What about sys_kexec_load()? > > Depends if you support kexec > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/