From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268674AbUIQKaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:30:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268675AbUIQKaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:30:39 -0400 Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.47]:4563 "EHLO mail-in-01.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268674AbUIQKaf (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:30:35 -0400 From: Michael Scondo Reply-To: michael.scondo@arcor.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: vfat bug - solved Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:30:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409170013.20712.michael.scondo@arcor.de> <20040917020405.GB2573@MAIL.13thfloor.at> In-Reply-To: <20040917020405.GB2573@MAIL.13thfloor.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409171230.07524.michael.scondo@arcor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 17. September 2004 04:04 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:20AM +0200, Michael Scondo wrote: > > Hello.. > > I've just compiled a new kernel ( 2.6.8.1 ), and now I'm not able to > > mount my fat32 partitions anymore. > > > > mount /dev/hda7 /mnt > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda7, > > or too many mounted file systems > > > > :-( > > > > Every works still fine with 2.6.4, but I'm not sure, whether this occurs > > due to a bug in the kernel or because a wrong build process. > > Therefore I'm posting this to the list. > > check the kernel ring buffer (dmesg) for codepages which > are requested but not found (or other strange messages) > which appear when you 'try' to mount the filesystem > > HTH, > Herbert Yes, the module fat wasn´t able to find cp437 as well as the charset iso8859-1. ( both configured as default ) If I pass the options "-o codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-15" to mount, everything works fine. Maybe, I should have been a little bit more watchful while configuring. But weren't it sensible to provide a mechanism, which prevent's such a silly configuration ? Thanks a lot Micha