From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266838AbUIROdN (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:33:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269518AbUIROdN (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:33:13 -0400 Received: from web53504.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.65]:40821 "HELO web53504.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266838AbUIROdG (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:33:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20040918143305.5840.qmail@web53504.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 07:33:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Lawrence Wong Subject: Re: Kernel 2.8.6.1 & VLAN & E100 To: Ben Greear Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <41478AFD.2080700@candelatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, I tried rc2-bk1 & rc2-bk3. rc2-bk1 solved the problem but rc2-bk3 crashed on startup when trying to bring up the loopback interface. The error started off with something about fib_.... but I was not able to capture it in the syslog. I guess I'll stick to rc2-bk1 for now. Thanks for the great help! --- Ben Greear wrote: > Lawrence Wong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am currently using Fedora Core 2 on a P3 w/512MB > > RAM, 2 x 18.2GB SCSI in RAID1 via an IBM > ServeRAID-4M. > > Network card is an Intel 100 S controller. > > > > All except the kernel is stock FC2. The kernel is > > 2.6.8.1 and compiled from the tarball found on > > ftp.kernel.org . > > > > Everything works fine until I tried to enable VLAN > and > > use VLAN subinterfaces. The VLAN subinterface > comes up > > fine but the moment I send traffic in/out of the > > interface (i.e. ping), a huge and neverending > chunk of > > "bad scheduling while atomic" errors pop up > > immediately and does not go away until I press > > CTRL+ALT+DEL. > > > > An extract of the error can be found below. But > when I > > run the system in normal non-VLAN mode, the > problem > > does not occur. So I am inclined to believe it > either > > has something to do with the VLAN driver or VLAN > > driver + INTEL 10/100 driver. > > > > Has anyone encountered before or know of any > > solutions? > > A patch is in the latest bk tree, at least. > > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail