mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phy Prabab <phyprabab@yahoo.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: resource provisioning
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:31:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925023149.73704.qmail@web51807.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040924112328.V1973@build.pdx.osdl.net>

Thanks for the information Chris.  This is a good
starting point.

Phy
--- Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> wrote:

> * Phy Prabab (phyprabab@yahoo.com) wrote:
> > I would like to know if the linux kernel has a
> > mechanism to control computing resources at a uid
> > level, which I will call "resource provisioning". 
> For
> > example, I would like to define on a multi cpu
> machine
> > that a list of uid's can not consume more than 1
> cpu
> > and no more than 1G RAM, irregardless or how many
> jobs
> > they launch on or to the system.
> 
> You can already do this in some pretty crude fashion
> via rlimits and
> sched_setaffinity (although the later doesn't have
> direct pam support
> that I know of, so you'd have to manage that on your
> own).
> 
> > So I guess, is this the correct term and is there
> a
> > posibilitity to do this now?
> 
> Otherwise, you must look at out of tree patches. 
> Linux-vserver does
> this, CKRM will allow you resource control, and PAGG
> + other module
> (perhaps job?) will give you this as well.
> 
> > I would like to avoid the virtual servers method
> as I
> > do not want to carve the machines in question into
> > more machines.
> 
> Note: the vserver method above doesn't create actual
> virtual machines,
> more like a software construct that you could
> consider a resource domain.
> 
> thanks,
> -chris
> -- 
> Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org   
>  http://lsm.bkbits.net
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-25  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-24 15:16 Phy Prabab
2004-09-24 18:23 ` Chris Wright
2004-09-25  2:31   ` Phy Prabab [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-24  8:37 Phy Prabab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040925023149.73704.qmail@web51807.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=phyprabab@yahoo.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®