Salut,

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:26:18PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > #define INLINE static inline  // an oxymoron
> > #define INLINE extern inline  // an oxymoron
> 
> The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic)
> will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
> often very important. e.g.
> 
> static INLINE int lock_need_resched(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> 	...

Mmm, shouldn't the comments be filtered *before* the definition is set
in place? Just wondering...

			    Tonnerre