hi :)

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Of course your way is more robust to future 'netif_carrier_ok' changes 
> and the compiler should optimize it way anyway since it is an inline 
> function, so I actually prefer the !! version :)

But perhaps those future changes would be interesting for userspace,
too?

-- 
Martin Waitz