From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269624AbUI3X61 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:58:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269629AbUI3X60 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:58:26 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:7852 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269628AbUI3X6N (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:58:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:01:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Garzik Cc: colin@colino.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert mistakenly applied patch to sungem Message-Id: <20040930170159.0291728b.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <415C91E0.7070005@pobox.com> References: <20040930100156.6012a290@pirandello> <415C91E0.7070005@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Colin Leroy wrote: > > Hi Andrew, everyone, > > > > There's a mistake in 2.6.9-rc3, you applied a patch I sent yesterday, > > for something that was already implemented (netpoll support in sungem). > > > > As Eric Lemoine and I didn't add the stuff at the same place, there has > > been no conflict. > > > > See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109647405508937&w=2 > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@4149f001_LtxxbZOVP8q363TiTcSVg > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@415b4276tcoFzDd1YSqq2ZJ_OkYlfQ > > > > Following is the reverse patch to reverse my stuff :) > > Sorry about that. > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Leroy > > Andrew are you picking up this one? umm, sure. That's another 40 patches in my future yet ;)