From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Cc: Vitezslav Samel <samel@mail.cz>
Subject: Re: [BUG] active ftp doesn't work since 2.6.9-rc1
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:10:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041001141050.GH27499@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041001132248.GG27499@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1965 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:22:48PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:12:01PM +0200, Vitezslav Samel wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After upgrade to 2.6.9-rc3 on the firewall (with NAT), active ftp stopped
> > working. The first kernel, which doesn't work is 2.6.9-rc1.
> > Sympotms: passive ftp works O.K., active FTP doesn't open data
> > stream (and in logs there entries about invalid packets - using
> > iptables ... -m state --state INVALID -j LOG)
Please use the following (attached) fix:
DaveM: Please apply and push to Linus:
Thanks!
Fix NAT helper code to update TCP window tracking information
if it resizes payload (and thus alrers sequence numbers).
This patchlet was somehow lost during 2.4.x->2.6.x port of TCP
window tracking :(
Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
--- linux-2.6.9-rc3-plain/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_helper.c 2004-10-01 12:08:40.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc3-test/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_helper.c 2004-10-01 13:37:05.283639640 +0000
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
return 1;
}
-/* TCP sequence number adjustment. Returns true or false. */
+/* TCP sequence number adjustment. Returns 1 on success, 0 on failure */
int
ip_nat_seq_adjust(struct sk_buff **pskb,
struct ip_conntrack *ct,
@@ -396,7 +396,12 @@
tcph->seq = newseq;
tcph->ack_seq = newack;
- return ip_nat_sack_adjust(pskb, tcph, ct, ctinfo);
+ if (!ip_nat_sack_adjust(pskb, tcph, ct, ctinfo))
+ return 0;
+
+ ip_conntrack_tcp_update(*pskb, ct, dir);
+
+ return 1;
}
static inline int
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-01 11:12 Vitezslav Samel
2004-10-01 13:22 ` Harald Welte
2004-10-01 14:10 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2004-10-01 22:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-04 5:00 ` Vitezslav Samel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041001141050.GH27499@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=samel@mail.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®