From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041005125324.A6910@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20041005T130541-400@post.gmane.org>; from richard.earnshaw@arm.com on Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:10:46AM +0000
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:10:46AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Rusty Russell <rusty <at> rustcorp.com.au> writes:
> > Russell, I thought about not including any symbol which is not of form
> > "[A-Za-z0-9_]+" in kallsyms, for all archs: you are not the only one
> > with weird-ass symbols. Is it that you want these mapping symbols in
> > /proc/kallsyms but ignored in backtraces, or you don't need them in
> > kallsyms altogether?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
>
>
> Mapping symbols will always be encoded with STB_LOCAL and STT_NOTYPE.
> I would have thought it unlikely that the kernel would ever want to
> report against any symbol with those attributes and they could all
> be dropped on that basis.
(Richard - your mailer appears to have dropped people from the CC: list...)
How about this patch? Is there a better way to parse the 'nm' output
to achieve the same as your suggestion above?
diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x *.orig -x *.rej orig/kernel/module.c linux/kernel/module.c
--- orig/kernel/module.c Wed Sep 22 16:07:38 2004
+++ linux/kernel/module.c Tue Oct 5 12:46:01 2004
@@ -1923,6 +1923,10 @@ static const char *get_ksymbol(struct mo
if (mod->symtab[i].st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF)
continue;
+ if (ELF_ST_BIND(mod->symtab[i].st_info) == STB_LOCAL
+ && ELF_ST_TYPE(mod->symtab[i].st_info) == STT_NOTYPE)
+ continue;
+
/* We ignore unnamed symbols: they're uninformative
* and inserted at a whim. */
if (mod->symtab[i].st_value <= addr
diff -up -x BitKeeper -x ChangeSet -x SCCS -x _xlk -x *.orig -x *.rej orig/scripts/kallsyms.c linux/scripts/kallsyms.c
--- orig/scripts/kallsyms.c Sun Jul 11 22:56:39 2004
+++ linux/scripts/kallsyms.c Tue Oct 5 12:51:26 2004
@@ -32,6 +32,17 @@ usage(void)
exit(1);
}
+/*
+ * This ignores the intensely annoying "mapping symbols" found
+ * in ARM ELF files: $a, $t and $d.
+ */
+static inline int
+is_arm_mapping_symbol(const char *str)
+{
+ return str[0] == '$' && strchr("atd", str[1]) &&
+ (str[2] == '\0' || str[2] == '.');
+}
+
static int
read_symbol(FILE *in, struct sym_entry *s)
{
@@ -56,7 +67,8 @@ read_symbol(FILE *in, struct sym_entry *
_sinittext = s->addr;
else if (strcmp(str, "_einittext") == 0)
_einittext = s->addr;
- else if (toupper(s->type) == 'A' || toupper(s->type) == 'U')
+ else if (toupper(s->type) == 'A' || toupper(s->type) == 'U' ||
+ is_arm_mapping_symbol(str))
return -1;
s->sym = strdup(str);
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-27 20:03 Russell King
2004-09-27 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-27 20:35 ` Russell King
2004-09-27 20:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-10-01 20:11 ` Russell King
2004-10-04 12:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2004-10-04 23:18 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-05 11:10 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 11:53 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-10-05 12:57 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:14 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 13:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:51 ` Russell King
2004-10-06 10:08 ` Adrian Cox
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Russell King
2004-10-12 13:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-07 14:54 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 23:00 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-07 12:35 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-07 15:01 ` Russell King
2004-10-07 16:39 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-05 13:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-08 15:04 ` Russell King
2004-10-08 16:36 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-08 18:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-08 19:43 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-20 11:38 ` [PATCH] Fix ARM kernel build with permitted binutils versions Russell King
2004-10-26 22:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041005125324.A6910@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome