From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269730AbUJGHLh (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:11:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269740AbUJGHLe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:11:34 -0400 Received: from siaag2ah.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.141]:55850 "EHLO siaag2ah.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269730AbUJGHIv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:08:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:05:38 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model) To: Trent Lloyd Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200410070308_MC3-1-8BB4-FF92@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Trent Lloyd wrote: > 2.6.8.1 was released because there was a 1-line error in 2.6.8 that > completely stopped NFS from working. > Yes, I know that. > The patches mentioned below will probably go into 2.6.9 or something, if > they have been approved for it etc. > A host of new bugs will probably be added too, leaving the average user with no stable 'offical' kernel to use -- ever. --Chuck Ebbert Vanity kills/It don't pay bills --ABC