Re: Possible GPL Violation of Linux in Amstrad's E3 Videophone

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:51:44PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:

 > >If you want to spend god alone knows how many hours tracking down
 > >who wrote what and nuking the relevant bits, that's your time to throw
 > >away. If you want the same featureset a little faster however, I
 > >believe SCO are still selling Openserver licenses.
 >
 > We would spend the time or remove the code.

'we' ?

 > OpenServer??? Gag?? Puke??
 > According to Carl "Mad Dog" McBride Linux is already his "product" (What a
 > joke). OpenServer is not Linux.

nor did I claim it to be. I claimed that respecting the wishes of everyone
who didn't want a part of your 'vision' would mean you'd end with something
on a par feature-wise with some inferior UNIX.

 > If I receive a confirmation from A) Linus or B) Alan then we will profer
 > a license agreement for everyone to review and sign off on via PGP 
 > secure email.

It's not a "Linus and Alan" thing, the copyrights on a bulk of the code
in the tree lies with other people.

 > This can be done, and if there is a process in place, others can come 
 > and give money as well.
 > It's time ALL YOU GUYS got rewarded for your hard work, and not just 
 > those who
 > positioned themselves to get fat stock options and IPO preffered stock 
 > for .com stock market
 > Google style IPO scams. It can happen.

You seem to be under the deluded illusion that all kernel hackers
do what they do for the money[1].

Please, either cut down the dosage, or increase it.

		Dave


[1] Whereas everyone knows, its all about the fast cars and chicks.