From: Borislav Petkov <petkov@uni-muenster.de>
To: David Gibson <hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Ricky lloyd <ricky.lloyd@gmail.com>,
Jan Dittmer <j.dittmer@portrix.net>,
Cal Peake <cp@absolutedigital.net>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
NetDev Mailing List <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
proski@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix readw/writew warnings in drivers/net/wireless/hermes.h
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:18:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410111518.39001.petkov@uni-muenster.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041011123137.GB28100@zax>
On Monday 11 October 2004 14:31, David Gibson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having the same pointer casting warnings with my ymfpci soundchip...
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:34:20PM +0530, Ricky lloyd wrote:
> > > Isn't the correct fix to declare iobase as (void __iomem *) ?
> >
> > Earlier today i had posted a patch which mainly fixes this same
> > problem with lotsa scsi
> > drivers and tulip drivers. I wondered the same "shouldnt all the addrs
> > be declared as
> > void __iomem* ??".
>
> The trouble with that is that for some versions of the orinoco card,
> the iobase refers to a legacy ISA IO address, not a memory-mapped IO
> address (that's the inw()/outw() path in the macro). That needs an
> integer, rather than a pointer.
however,
I don't think there should be any casting of IO addresses for the simple reason that the void __iomem *
is a part of an interface which does the right thing in both MMIO/PIO cases. The lkml
thread "Being more anal about iospace accesses.." contains the answer to
that in a great detail. As a result, the right thing to do here is, I think, to declare all addrs void __iomem*.
Which leaves a question: while compiling the following code fragment:
<sound/pci/ymfpci/ymfpci_main.c>
static inline u8 snd_ymfpci_readb(ymfpci_t *chip, u32 offset)
{
return readb(chip->reg_area_virt + offset);
}
gcc complains as so:
sound/pci/ymfpci/ymfpci_main.c: In function `snd_ymfpci_readb':
sound/pci/ymfpci/ymfpci_main.c:57: warning: passing arg 1 of `readb' makes pointer from integer without a cast
Do we have to cast here or use the new interface?
>
> It's not clear to me which way around the cast is less ugly.
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-11 11:34 Cal Peake
2004-10-11 11:54 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-10-11 12:04 ` Ricky lloyd
2004-10-11 12:31 ` David Gibson
2004-10-11 12:42 ` Cal Peake
2004-10-11 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2004-10-11 13:33 ` viro
2004-10-11 12:23 ` Cal Peake
2004-10-11 12:29 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-10-11 12:32 ` David Gibson
2004-10-11 12:39 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-10-11 12:49 ` Ben Dooks
2004-10-11 13:16 ` viro
2004-10-11 14:16 ` Cal Peake
2004-10-11 13:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2004-10-11 14:04 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410111518.39001.petkov@uni-muenster.de \
--to=petkov@uni-muenster.de \
--cc=cp@absolutedigital.net \
--cc=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=j.dittmer@portrix.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=ricky.lloyd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®