From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268919AbUJPWHR (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:07:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268922AbUJPWHQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:07:16 -0400 Received: from jurassic.park.msu.ru ([195.208.223.243]:39561 "EHLO jurassic.park.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268919AbUJPWHJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:07:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:06:36 +0400 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Erwin Schoenmakers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: while building kernel 2.6.8.1. for Alpha (Miata) Message-ID: <20041017020636.A23552@jurassic.park.msu.ru> References: <417139A2.5090705@planet.nl> <20041016191704.A20686@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20041016153017.GE5307@stusta.de> <20041016195847.A20976@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20041016172154.GH5307@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20041016172154.GH5307@stusta.de>; from bunk@stusta.de on Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 07:21:54PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 07:21:54PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The gcc dependency sounds pretty tough. Sorry, I was thinking of some miscompilation problems unrelated to kernel. > Why isn't even gcc 3.3.3 able to produce a kernel on Alpha? Actually, gcc 3.1 should be sufficient. Ivan.