From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
willy@debian.org,
Linux1394-Devel <linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.9
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:17:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041019161723.GO16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098194090.1714.3.camel@mulgrave>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:54:43AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> The condition codes are all migrating to SAM_STAT_ prefix, so
> CHECK_CONDITION becomes SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION (and gets shifted in
> the process).
>
> We still have a nasty namespace pollution problem on the SCSI commands
> though and cleaning this up is problematic since they permeate not just
> SCSI but large areas of other drivers as well.
How would you feel about COMMAND_COMPLETE -> SPI_MSG_COMMAND_COMPLETE,
possibly even turning them into an enum, and putting them in the new
file <scsi/spi.h>?
That would get us out of the problems with SBP defining different numbers
for the same constants. sbp2 (a) wouldn't include <scsi/spi.h> and (b)
would use an SBP_MSG_ prefix anyway
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-18 22:03 James Bottomley
2004-10-19 0:30 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-19 4:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-19 5:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-19 5:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-19 7:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-19 7:42 ` Ben Collins
2004-10-19 8:03 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-19 13:54 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-19 16:17 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041019161723.GO16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcollins@debian.org \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®