mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*()
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:01:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020100103.G1047@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098261745.6263.9.camel@gaston>; from benh@kernel.crashing.org on Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:42:26PM +1000

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:42:26PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I really don't want to mess with that racy mecanism that makes sense for
> ISA only afaik, and it seems some drivers are trying to use it now that
> it's there (/me looks toward yenta_socket) and I'm afraid of the
> consequences since I cannot see how that thing can work properly in the
> first place ;)

yenta_socket has always used it.  Its rather fundamental to the way
that the PCMCIA core has worked for the last I don't know how many
years.

Nothing new.  Maybe something in PPC64 land broke recently?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-20  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-20  7:08 [PATCH] Fix PREEMPT_ACTIVE definition Paul Mackerras
2004-10-20  8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20  8:42   ` New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20  8:48     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20  8:53       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20  9:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-20 10:56           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20  9:31       ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-10-20  9:01     ` Russell King [this message]
2004-10-20 10:50       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 11:01         ` Russell King
2004-10-20 11:06           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-20 11:53           ` Paul Mackerras
2004-10-20 12:31             ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041020100103.G1047@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome