From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Input: remove pm_dev from core
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:25:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410210825.00133.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041021101358.B3089@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thursday 21 October 2004 04:13 am, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:30:02AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > ChangeSet@1.1971, 2004-10-20 00:57:45-05:00, dtor_core@ameritech.net
> > Input: get rid of pm_dev in input core as it is deprecated and
> > nothing uses it anyway.
>
> You might as well remove it completely - anything which uses the
> driver model PM implementation will never call these methods, and
> ARM uses the driver model PM implementation.
>
> Therefore, any driver using the obsolete pm_register() functions
> won't receive any PM events.
>
> Same is true on x86 btw.
>
Hmm, I admit I missed arm case but for x86 should work actually:
in arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:
static int suspend(int vetoable)
{
int err;
struct apm_user *as;
if (pm_send_all(PM_SUSPEND, (void *)3)) {
/* Vetoed */
if (vetoable) {
if (apm_info.connection_version > 0x100)
set_system_power_state(APM_STATE_REJECT);
err = -EBUSY;
ignore_sys_suspend = 0;
printk(KERN_WARNING "apm: suspend was vetoed.\n");
goto out;
}
printk(KERN_CRIT "apm: suspend was vetoed, but suspending anyway.\n");
}
device_suspend(3);
device_power_down(3);
...
but since you say arm does not care I think we'll proceed with the patch.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-21 7:23 [PATCH 0/7] New input patches Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] Input: whitespace fixes Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] Input: remove class devices on disconnect Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] Input: link input_dev and serio (sysfs) Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] Input: i8042 runtime debug switch Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] Input: i8042 remove old-style PM handling Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] Input: i8042 remove reboot notifier Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 7:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] Input: remove pm_dev from core Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-21 9:13 ` Russell King
2004-10-21 13:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2004-10-23 20:49 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410210825.00133.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome