From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: BUG_ONs in signal.c?
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:23:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410250923.54067.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410230429.i9N4TOZK027399@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On Friday, October 22, 2004 9:29 pm, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Oh, duh. The race is obvious. Sorry for the confusion there.
> I think this is the way to fix it.
>
> --- linux-2.6/kernel/signal.c 19 Oct 2004 15:03:02 -0000 1.143
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/signal.c 23 Oct 2004 04:23:31 -0000
> @@ -1909,22 +1910,16 @@ relock:
> * Anything else is fatal, maybe with a core dump.
> */
> current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED;
> - if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr) &&
> - do_coredump((long)signr, signr, regs)) {
> + if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr)) {
> /*
> - * That killed all other threads in the group and
> - * synchronized with their demise, so there can't
> - * be any more left to kill now. The group_exit
> - * flags are set by do_coredump. Note that
> - * thread_group_empty won't always be true yet,
> - * because those threads were blocked in __exit_mm
> - * and we just let them go to finish dying.
> - */
> - const int code = signr | 0x80;
> - BUG_ON(!current->signal->group_exit);
> - BUG_ON(current->signal->group_exit_code != code);
> - do_exit(code);
> - /* NOTREACHED */
> + * If it was able to dump core, this kills all
> + * other threads in the group and synchronizes with
> + * their demise. If we lost the race with another
> + * thread getting here, it set group_exit_code
> + * first and our do_group_exit call below will use
> + * that value and ignore the one we pass it.
> + */
> + do_coredump((long)signr, signr, regs);
> }
>
> /*
Yeah, this looks good, although we'll end up calling do_group_exit instead of
do_exit for the dumped task, is that ok?
> While looking at this, I noticed a bug (not directly related) in
> do_coredump. It was setting the "core dumped" flag even when the format
> dumping hook failed (e.g. for memory allocation failures).
>
>
> --- linux-2.6/fs/exec.c 19 Oct 2004 15:05:13 -0000 1.146
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/exec.c 23 Oct 2004 04:23:42 -0000
> @@ -1417,7 +1417,8 @@ int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_cod
>
> retval = binfmt->core_dump(signr, regs, file);
>
> - current->signal->group_exit_code |= 0x80;
> + if (retval)
> + current->signal->group_exit_code |= 0x80;
> close_fail:
> filp_close(file, NULL);
> fail_unlock:
Yeah, saw this too, sorry I forgot to mention it.
Thanks,
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-25 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20041022204751.3f7a3b1f.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-10-23 4:14 ` Roland McGrath
2004-10-23 4:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-23 4:29 ` Roland McGrath
2004-10-25 16:23 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-10-25 18:54 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410250923.54067.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®