From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Sorav Bansal <sbansal@stanford.edu>
Cc: tacetan@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: User/Kernel Pointer bug in sys_poll
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:48:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028024839.6a1e1064.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0410272246240.7124-100000@elaine9.Stanford.EDU>
Sorav Bansal <sbansal@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> Older x86 architectures (386 and before) allow the kernel to write to any
> user location regardless of the write-protect bits.
>
> Hence, with this bug, a user program could write to the write-protected
> region of its address space by calling the sys_poll system call and
> setting the address and data values appropriately.
Nope. The only significant difference between copy_from_user() and
__put_user() here is that copy_from_user() checks that the address is not
in the 0xc0000000-0xffffffff range. __put_user() skips that check.
So
if (copy_from_user(kaddr, addr, n))
fail();
__put_user(42, addr);
is safe. We know that the address is in the 0x00000000-0xbfffffff range by
the time we call __put_user(). And if the page at *addr it not writeable
the kernel will take a fault.
So I see no hole. But I wouldn't have coded it that way...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20041028052218.52478.qmail@web50207.mail.yahoo.com>
2004-10-28 5:57 ` Sorav Bansal
2004-10-28 9:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-10-28 10:04 ` Sorav Bansal
2004-10-28 19:24 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <20041028052218.52478.qmail@web50207.mail.yahoo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.44.0410272246240.7124-100000@elaine9.Stanford.EDU.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-10-28 6:32 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 8:50 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-10-28 4:25 Sorav Bansal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041028024839.6a1e1064.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbansal@stanford.edu \
--cc=tacetan@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®