From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262837AbUJ1JI5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:08:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262839AbUJ1JI4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:08:56 -0400 Received: from colino.net ([213.41.131.56]:17905 "EHLO paperstreet.colino.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262837AbUJ1JIy (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:08:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:07:31 +0200 From: Colin Leroy To: David Brownell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.10-rc1 OHCI usb error messages Message-ID: <20041028110731.74ac5eb5.colin@colino.net> In-Reply-To: <200410271559.37540.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20041026172843.6ac07c1a.colin@colino.net> <200410260905.14869.david-b@pacbell.net> <20041027110756.3217ed68.colin@colino.net> <200410271559.37540.david-b@pacbell.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12cvs132.1 (GTK+ 2.4.0; i686-redhat-linux-gnu) X-Face: Fy:*XpRna1/tz}cJ@O'0^:qYs:8b[Rg`*8,+o^[fI?<%5LeB,Xz8ZJK[r7V0hBs8G)*&C+XA0qHoR=LoTohe@7X5K$A-@cN6n~~J/]+{[)E4h'lK$13WQf$.R+Pi;E09tk&{t|;~dakRD%CLHrk6m!?gA,5|Sb=fJ=>[9#n1Bu8?VngkVM4{'^'V_qgdA.8yn3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27 Oct 2004 at 15h10, David Brownell wrote: Hi, > You're not reporting that it fails to activate when there's an > active device connected; and you obviously enabled CONFIG_PM, > which Kconfig says means that > > ... parts of your computer are shut off or put into a > power conserving "sleep" mode if they are not being used. > > So: since it's not being actively used then, why shouldn't the > root hub (or any other device) be suspended? During boot, or at > any other time. So long as it works when you plug in a USB device, > it looks to me like everything is behaving quite reasonably. That's right. Just that it didn't do so previously, so i didn't think of that. > > At least, it's not on 2.6.9. Also, > > lsusb -v fails with long timeouts due to that on 2.6.10-rc1, > > not on 2.6.9. > > I've never observed "lsusb" ever timing out when accessing a > suspended USB device; the URB submissions fail right away. Strange. Something else maybe... > So if something's timing out, it's for some other reason. > (Such as bugs in "lsusb"; the "usbutils" package is overdue > for a new release, it's changed a lot since the 0.11 tarball > that's widely available.) Yes, btw, I once sent a patch about lsusb endianness problems, and didn't hear anything back about it. I ended up sending the patch to the gentoo guys so that at least my distro is fixed: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43565 -- Colin