From: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
suparna@in.ibm.com, dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [0/3] PATCH Kprobes for x86_64- 2.6.9-final
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:23:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028155359.GB11182@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028113744.GA82042@muc.de>
Hi Andi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks
Prasanna
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:37:44PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Like I still would like to have the page fault notifier
> completely moved out of the fast path into no_context
> (that i386 has it there is also wrong). Adding kprobe_runn
> doesn't make a difference.
The kprobes fault handler is called if an exception is
generated for any instruction within the fault-handler or when
Kprobes single-steps the probed instruction.
AFAIK kprobes does not handle page faults in the above case and just returns
immediately resuming the normal execution.
>
> And the jprobe_return_end change is wrong, my suggestion
> was to move it into the inline assembler statement. Adding asmlinkage
> doesn't help at all
> (I think i386 gets this wrong too)
>
In the below code, I moved jprobe_return_end to inline assembler statement.
void jprobe_return(void)
{
preempt_enable_no_resched();
asm volatile (" xchg %%rbx,%%rsp \n"
" int3 \n"
" .globl jprobe_return_end \n"
" jprobe_return_end: \n"
" nop \n"::"b"
(jprobe_saved_rsp):"memory");
}
> -Andi
--
Thanks & Regards
Prasanna S Panchamukhi
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Ph: 91-80-25044636
<prasanna@in.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-28 11:32 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:34 ` [1/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:35 ` [2/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:38 ` [3/3] " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 21:06 ` [patch 3/3] kprobes : Minor changes for sparc64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 21:03 ` [patch 2/3] kprobes : kprobes ported to x86_64 Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-30 20:59 ` [patch 1/3] kprobes: Minor i386 changes required for porting kprobes " Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2004-10-28 11:37 ` [0/3] PATCH Kprobes for x86_64- 2.6.9-final Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 15:53 ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi [this message]
2004-10-28 23:42 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 18:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-28 23:41 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041028155359.GB11182@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome