From: Bill Huey (hui) <bhuey@lnxw.com>
To: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.9
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:44:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041102234424.GA22115@nietzsche.lynx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32932.192.168.1.8.1099437703.squirrel@192.168.1.8>
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 11:21:43PM -0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> As a personal comment, I've never, never seen so good figures in any other
> kernel I've came across in the last couple of years. I hope this can only
> go to the better ;)
Hard RT guarantees is the goal of this project afterall. It's absolutely
going to happen. You can bet on it.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-02 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-02 18:00 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-02 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 22:04 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 23:21 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.9 Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-02 23:44 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2004-11-03 0:39 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-03 1:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 1:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 2:54 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
2004-11-03 3:45 ` K.R. Foley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041102234424.GA22115@nietzsche.lynx.com \
--to=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=nando@ccrma.stanford.edu \
--cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®