From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
Cc: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:48:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041103204812.GA11010@taniwha.stupidest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041103201836.GB29289@bytesex>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 09:18:36PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Not sure whenever tt is fixed with my patch, I've tested skas only
> (I'm building skas-only dynamically linked kernels these days
> because due to working on x11 framebuffer stuff which needs
> dynamically linked libX11).
it would be nice to find a way to make this work TT mode for you
> So if Chris actually tested TT then his patch probably is ok and
> needed as well ...
i'm only using TT mode at present, i don't check esoteric modes that
require host-OS patches at present
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-03 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-03 11:37 [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 11:47 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-11-03 12:08 ` [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2) Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 19:28 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 20:09 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 22:51 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 20:18 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-11-03 20:48 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2004-11-04 0:23 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 23:19 ` Blaisorblade
[not found] ` <200411040113.27747.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
[not found] ` <20041104003943.GB17467@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2004-11-04 4:31 ` Fixing UML against NPTL (was: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2)) Blaisorblade
2004-11-11 17:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 18:31 ` Christophe Saout
2004-11-11 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12 0:09 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041103204812.GA11010@taniwha.stupidest.org \
--to=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®