From: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Siep Kroonenberg <siepo@cybercomm.nl>,
278068@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: chmod messes up permissions on hfs filesystem
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:31:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041104033129.GQ4511@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411031639250.877@scrub.home>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 05:00:35PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Horms wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patch, though the behaviour of the umask still seems
> > rather odd. I would like to offer an updated patch which I believe
> > makes the umask behave in the expected way. It also ensures
> > that the write_lock bit is read from/written to disk correctly.
>
> You apply the umask before updating the write bit, which is incorrect.
I tried to account for that, but perhaps I missed.
> > @@ -196,6 +197,11 @@ struct inode *hfs_new_inode(struct inode
> > HFS_I(inode)->cached_blocks = 0;
> > memset(HFS_I(inode)->first_extents, 0, sizeof(hfs_extent_rec));
> > memset(HFS_I(inode)->cached_extents, 0, sizeof(hfs_extent_rec));
> > + inode->i_mode = (mode & ~0777) | (~hsb->s_file_umask & 0777);
> > + if (mode & S_IWUSR)
> > + inode->i_mode |= S_IWUGO;
> > + else
> > + inode->i_mode &= ~S_IWUGO;
> > }
> > insert_inode_hash(inode);
> > mark_inode_dirty(inode);
>
> Thanks, for reminding me to fix hfs_new_inode here, but the above applies.
No problem.
> > ===== fs/hfs/super.c 1.32 vs edited =====
> > --- 1.32/fs/hfs/super.c 2004-10-26 05:06:47 +09:00
> > +++ edited/fs/hfs/super.c 2004-11-01 20:01:54 +09:00
> > @@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ static int parse_options(char *options,
> > /* initialize the sb with defaults */
> > hsb->s_uid = current->uid;
> > hsb->s_gid = current->gid;
> > - hsb->s_file_umask = 0644;
> > - hsb->s_dir_umask = 0755;
> > + hsb->s_file_umask = 0111;
> > + hsb->s_dir_umask = 0000;
> > hsb->s_type = hsb->s_creator = cpu_to_be32(0x3f3f3f3f); /* == '????' */
> > hsb->s_quiet = 0;
> > hsb->part = -1;
>
> This may be closer to the mac default, where everyone can access anything,
> but I'd rather keep a safe default.
> Below is my updated patch.
Thanks, I will give it a spin and get back to you.
--
Horms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-04 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-01 4:35 Horms
2004-11-01 11:05 ` Horms
2004-11-01 16:27 ` Roman Zippel
2004-11-02 3:56 ` Horms
2004-11-03 16:00 ` Roman Zippel
2004-11-04 3:31 ` Horms [this message]
2004-11-04 4:35 ` Horms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041104033129.GQ4511@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=278068@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siepo@cybercomm.nl \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®