mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] [2/6] LSM Stacking: Add stacker LSM
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:42:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041104144258.A2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099609681.2096.16.camel@serge.austin.ibm.com>; from serue@us.ibm.com on Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:08:01PM -0600

* Serge Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> This patch adds the stacker module, still required in order to
> stack several LSMs.  In order to use this with SELinux, it must be
> compiled into the kernel.  Otherwise, it can be loaded as a module.

all the stacker_rwsem business has got to go.  can't you make the same
array assumptions as the blobs, and assign modules to slots?  also the
sysfs stuff should go into a (not quite yet) existing subsystem.  i'm
not positive the authoritative capable() hook logic is right.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-04 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-04 23:04 [RFC] [PATCH] [0/6] LSM Stacking Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 22:52 ` Chris Wright
2004-11-05  1:01   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-11-05  1:05     ` Chris Wright
2004-11-05  2:16       ` James Morris
2004-11-04 23:06 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [1/6] LSM Stacking: Replace LSM void* with arrays Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 22:34   ` Chris Wright
2004-11-04 23:08 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [2/6] LSM Stacking: Add stacker LSM Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 22:42   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-11-10 17:43   ` Jonathan Corbet
2004-11-10 19:32     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:08 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [3/6] LSM Stacking: capability LSM stacking support Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:09 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [4/6] LSM Stacking: seclvl " Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:11 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [5/6] LSM Stacking: SELinux " Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 22:45   ` Chris Wright
2004-11-04 23:12 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [6/6] LSM Stacking: temporary setprocattr hack Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 22:48   ` Chris Wright
2004-11-05  0:52     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-11-05  0:56       ` Chris Wright
2004-11-04 23:14 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [1/3] LSM Stacking: stackable bsdjail (tasklookup) Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:15 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [2/3] LSM Stacking: stackable bsdjail (bsdjail lsm) Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:16 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [3/3] LSM Stacking: stackable bsdjail (Documentation) Serge Hallyn
2004-11-04 23:51 ` [RFC] [PATCH] [0/6] LSM Stacking James Morris
2004-11-05  7:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-05 16:32   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-11-05 16:51   ` Stephen Smalley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041104144258.A2357@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®