From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Richard Waltham <richard@fars-robotics.net>,
SUPPORT <support@4bridgeworks.com>,
Thomas Babut <thomas@babut.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux SCSI <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
groudier@free.fr
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.x hangs with Symbios Logic 53c1010 Ultra3 SCSI Ada pter
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:45:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041106184555.GD24690@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041106120358.GC23305@infradead.org>
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:03:58PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 03:59:51AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:02:32AM -0000, Richard Waltham wrote:
> > > Good as a backup but the original PPR capability is defined in
> > > scan_scsi.c. Shouldn't scan_scsi.c take note of the bus mode and enable
> > > PPR capabilities accordingly? This would then cover this issue for all
> > > relevant LLDDs wouldn't it?
> >
> > scan_scsi.c doesn't know what mode the bus is in. scan_scsi.c doesn't
> > even know whether the bus is SPI, FC, iSCSI, SAS or SATA.
>
> And PPR only makes sense for SPI anyway. An good argument why this
> should move to the SPI transport class, which does know about SE vs HVD
> vs LVD.
That would make sense if more of this were done at a higher level.
As it is right now, the decision whether to use PPR, SDTR or WDTR is
entirely up to the driver. I think there's a lot more consolidation
that could be done into the midlayer, but we should probably see what
other drivers requirements are before making it perfect for sym2.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-06 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-06 0:02 Richard Waltham
2004-11-06 3:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-06 4:46 ` Doug Ledford
2004-11-06 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-06 18:45 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-05 16:25 SUPPORT
2004-11-05 20:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041106184555.GD24690@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=groudier@free.fr \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@fars-robotics.net \
--cc=support@4bridgeworks.com \
--cc=thomas@babut.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®