From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261697AbUKGVug (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:50:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261695AbUKGVuf (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:50:35 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:10191 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261697AbUKGVuI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:50:08 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm3: swsusp problems w/ ALSA driver, IRQs on AMD64 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:48:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org References: <200411062014.08202.rjw@sisk.pl> <20041107143858.GF1176@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20041107143858.GF1176@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411072248.54627.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 07 of November 2004 15:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > I'm having some troubles with swsusp on 2.6.10-rc1-mm3 (Athlon 64-based laptop > > w/ NForce3 chipset), although I don't think that swsusp itself is to > > blame. > > Did it work ok on other kernels? On 2.6.10-rc1 it works even without pci=routeirq. On 2.6.10-rc1-mm2 it did after I had used pci=routeirq, but I have tried it only once. > Does it work when you rmmod intel8x0 before suspend? Yes, it does, except for the pci=routeirq, which seems to be mandatory. Greets, RJW -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"