From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: unix_gc and file_count
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:18:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041108084825.GA8704@impedimenta.in.ibm.com> (raw)
I am trying to clean up uses of file_count in 2.6 as suggested by Viro
earlier. Biggest hurdle is unix_gc. I am trying to get rid of file_count in
unix_gc. But I am not sure if I understand unix_gc very well.
I thought I'd put out questions I've been having...
Appreciate if someone can clarify.
Here goes:
unix_gc pushes a root set onto a stack. This root set is not to be garbage
collected. Root set is determined by the condition:
if (open_count > atomic_read(&unix_sk(s)->inflight))
>From my understanding, for a unix socket, opencount cannot be less than
inflight, simply because unix_*_sendmsg bumps up the f_count of each struct
file of the passed fd array through scm_send. inflight is later bumped up at
unix_attach_fds for unix sockets in the fd[] payload. unix_*_recvmsg bumps
down inflight for unix sockets of the payload fd[] and later does a fput for
all fds of the payload fd array. Hence, the condition for sockets to
be GC'ed is open_count == inflight. If open_count is +'ve for a GC able socket,
it means the open_count is only because the socket is part of a fd payload
waiting to be received. Some of the sockets with open_count == inflight
may not be GC'ed if they happen to be in the receive queue as a fd payload
of a inuse unix socket (on the stack). All sockets which can be GC'ed will
be in the hash list with unix_sk(s)->gc_tree == GC_ORPHAN;
unix_gc then walks through all the unix sockets in the hashtable, and
processes sockets marked for gc (GC_ORPHAN). unix_gc frees up the skbs in the
receive queue of these unix sockets which have a fd[] payload on that skb.
Other skbs are left as is.
1. Even if gc doesn't garbage collect the fd[] payload skbs, they'll be later
freed by unix_release through __fput when the f_count for that socket goes to 0.
Isn't a GC just for fd[] payloads which will anyway be freed wasteful? I
probably am missing something here........
2. Now, other skbs are left as is, what is the need for just the fd[] payload
to be freed? Either free all skbs or free none at all no?
3. If a process does a sendmsg with SCM_RIGHTS payload and the process which
is supposed to do do recvmsg dies, will the payload fd[] f_count not hang
around for ever? Only the fds which are unix sockets will have their skbs having
fd[] load cleaned up. All struct (file)s of the payload remain....
Appreciate if someone can answer the above/point out gaps in my understanding.
Thanks,
Kiran
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-08 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-08 8:48 Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2004-11-08 10:35 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041108084825.GA8704@impedimenta.in.ibm.com \
--to=kiran@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®