mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:52:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411092152.30944.shawn.starr@rogers.com> (raw)


Everyone seems to be talking about the distribution, my concern is if people who pay 
$20 to get the binaries are *NOT* getting the sources which is a violation of the GPL for the GPL parts of the firmware.

If thats not a violation I don't know what is.

Shawn.

> list:       linux-kernel
> Subject:    Re: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code
> From:       Michael Poole <mdpoole () troilus ! org>
> Date:       2004-11-10 2:01:44
> Message-ID: <87ekj2fomv.fsf () sanosuke ! troilus ! org>
> [Download message RAW]
> 
> Kyle Moffett writes:
> 
> > In this case however, you buy the right to future updates for $20.
> > This is
> > a contract between you and SveaSoft that essentially says:
> > > If you pay SveaSoft $20, you will receive all updates for the next
> > > year.
> > > If you chose to exercise your GPL right to redistribute, however, you
> > > will lose the subscription you paid $20 for."
> > 
> > The penalty for exercising your GPL distribution right is losing your
> > $20 subscription.  I believe that such a penalty is a restriction on you
> > exercising your GPL rights.
> 
> It is no such thing.
> 
>   Restriction \Re*stric"tion\, n. [F. restriction, L. restrictio.]
>      1. The act of restricting, or state of being restricted;
>         confinement within limits or bounds.
> 
> You can fully exercise your rights under the GPL; they are not
> restricted.  However, you cannot expect future support from Sveasoft.
> Only your contract entitles you to that support, and if you do
> something to terminate your contract, it is outside the GPL's scope.
> 
> This is unpleasant for a lot of people.  It is probably suboptimal for
> the free software community.  Life can be hard like that.  Any
> competent lawyer could have a copyright infringement claim dismissed
> if the claim were based on your theory of the GPL.
> 
> Michael Poole
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-11-10  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200411092152.30944.shawn.starr@rogers.com \
    --to=shawn.starr@rogers.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®