From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: discuss@x86-64.org
Cc: "Jin, Gordon" <gordon.jin@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH x86_64]: Setup PER_LINUX32 on x86_64
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:51:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411101051.37702.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8126E4F969BA254AB43EA03C59F44E84BBECA2@pdsmsx404>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]
On Dinsdag 02 November 2004 09:47, Jin, Gordon wrote:
> On x86_64, PER_LINUX32 is not setup but used by syscall personality and uname.
> This patch sets PER_LINUX32 when x86 binary loaded so it can be used correctly.
> - Set personality to PER_LINUX32 when x86 binary loaded.
> - Set personality to PER_LINUX when x86_64 binary loaded.
> - Use sys32_personality instead of sys_personality.
> - Add sys32_newuname() for syscall newuname.
> - Remove the unnecessary check for PER_LINUX32 in sys_uname().
That behavior would be significantly different from the current one,
which is also used on all other biarch architectures. This probably
breaks lots of user setups.
I also think the current behavior is the right one. For things like
configure, you need a way to set the uname independent of the binary
format of your shell. Another example is building rpm packages
on a mixed system, where should be able to set the personality
to decide which target architecture to build for.
Arnd <><
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-10 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-02 8:47 Jin, Gordon
2004-11-10 9:51 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411101051.37702.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=gordon.jin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome