mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Alexandre Costa <alebyte@gmail.com>,
	linux-os@analogic.com
Subject: Re: DEVFS_FS
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:01:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411110101.30463.gene.heskett@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041111001909.GA18269@kroah.com>

On Wednesday 10 November 2004 19:19, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:06:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 10 November 2004 16:03, Alexandre Costa wrote:
>> >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:46:06 -0500 (EST), linux-os
>> >
>> ><linux-os@chaos.analogic.com> wrote:
>> >> What is the approved substitute for DEVFS_FS that is marked
>> >> obsolete?
>> >
>> >udev
>> >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev.html
>>
>> Humm, I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with that choice.  I have an
>> FC3RC5 install on an old P-II running at 233mhz, and the udev
>> start in the bootup is the slowest single thing to get started by
>> an order of magnitude.
>>
>> Can someone tell me a good reason udev wastes as much time as the
>> post does checking 383 megs of memory, which is very nearly a
>> minute even just for udev?
>
>It's all up to the rules you are using for udev.  If you have udev
> rules that call out to scripts for every device (like I think the
> SuSE default install does), udevstart can take a long time.
>
This is a box stock FC3RC5 install, Greg.  I haven't touched a thing 
in how it works because I don't know anything about it, other than 
its about 1/3rd of the total boot time.

>If you don't have any external dependancies, udevstart is fast.
>
>> If its to be used, its got to speed itself up, a LOT!.
>
>Please post what version of udev you are using, and what your udev
> rules file looks like.

Probably see the FC3 release, but I don't know how much diff there is 
between RC5 and the final, rsync is trying to convert mine to final 
right now.  Where is this rules file?

>thanks,
>
>greg k-h

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.28% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-11  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-10 20:46 DEVFS_FS linux-os
2004-11-10 21:03 ` DEVFS_FS Alexandre Costa
2004-11-11  0:06   ` DEVFS_FS Gene Heskett
2004-11-11  0:19     ` DEVFS_FS Greg KH
2004-11-11  6:01       ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2004-11-11 19:53 DEVFS_FS Adam J. Richter
2004-11-11 20:24 DEVFS_FS Adam J. Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200411110101.30463.gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --to=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --cc=alebyte@gmail.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®