Re: [ACPI] [2.6 patch] drivers/acpi: #ifdef unused functions away

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:40:17PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:36:50PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:17:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:21:34AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > This patch only #ifdef's completely unused code away - it does not make 
> > > > the many global functions only used inside the file they are defined in 
> > > > static.
> > > 
> > > It also ifdefs out the acpi_install_gpe_handler and acpi_remove_gpe_handler
> > > calls I use in the driver I posted on Sunday.  Please fix this.
> > 
> > ????
> > 
> > My patch doesn't #ifdef these functions away.
> 
> Sorry, acpi_remove_gpe_block, not acpi_remove_gpe_handler:
> 
> @@ -383,6 +398,7 @@
>  acpi_status
>  acpi_remove_gpe_block (
>         acpi_handle                     gpe_device);
> +#endif  /*  ACPI_FUTURE_USAGE  */

I didn't saw your patch on linux-kernel, and although Len has said that 
he'd apply my patches I have yet to hear an answer indicating either 
problems in my patches or that he'd applied them.

Did Len already integrate your driver into his tree?

If yes, I will correct the acpi_remove_gpe_block case (it's only this 
one function?) as soon as his tree appears in the next -mm.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed