From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262230AbUKQI0w (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:26:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262233AbUKQI0w (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:26:52 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:9934 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262230AbUKQI0v (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:26:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:26:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] i386: always enable REGPARM Message-Id: <20041117002620.5f03f5a5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041117043223.GF4943@stusta.de> References: <20041117043223.GF4943@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Is there still a known reason to disable CONFIG_REGPARM on i386 with > gcc 3? Well it lets us turn it off again if we suspect a regparm-related bug. That's happened a couple of times.