From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262566AbUKRAnG (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:43:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262629AbUKRAla (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:41:30 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:17827 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262619AbUKRAbF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:31:05 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc2: strange behavior on dual Opteron w/ NUMA [u] Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:29:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton References: <200411152306.15606.rjw@sisk.pl> <20041115223509.GE3062@wotan.suse.de> <200411160032.13112.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200411160032.13112.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411180129.11600.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 16 of November 2004 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 15 of November 2004 23:35, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I suspect that this has been intorduced in 2.6.10-rc1-mm5, so if you have > any > > > ideas, please let me know. If you need more information, please let me > know > > > too. > > > > Could be the recent futex change. It seems to cause all kinds of problems. > > I would try reverting that. > > You mean futex_wait-fix.patch? Hasn't it already been identified as a buggy > one? For the record: 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 does not seem to have the problem, and it has the futex_wait-fix.patch reverted, apparently, so I assume that this patch was really to blame. Greets, RJW -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"