From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262613AbUKZTzK (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:55:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263955AbUKZTyO (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:54:14 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:53187 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262479AbUKZTbX (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:31:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:34:00 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: "Zhu, Yi" Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] make pm_suspend_disk suspend/resume sysdev and dpm_off_irq Message-ID: <20041125113400.GA1027@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8403BD586A@pdsmsx403> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8403BD586A@pdsmsx403> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >> This patch makes the new swsusp code ( pm_suspend_disk since > >> 2.6.9-rc3) call suspend/resume functions for sysdev and devices in > >> dpm_off_irq list. Otherwise, PCI link device in the system won't > >> provide correct interrupt for PCI devices during resume. > > > > I do not think this is right approach; you enable interrupts > > then disable that again, potentially without interrupt controller > > being initialized. > > > > This should be better patch: > > Agreed. Your patch solves the bug. But do you plan to deal with the > devices in dpm_off_irq list? Okay, this should be better patch. It works here. Pavel --- clean/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2004-10-19 14:16:29.000000000 +0200 +++ linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2004-11-25 12:27:35.000000000 +0100 @@ -854,11 +840,13 @@ if ((error = arch_prepare_suspend())) return error; local_irq_disable(); + device_power_down(3); save_processor_state(); error = swsusp_arch_suspend(); /* Restore control flow magically appears here */ restore_processor_state(); restore_highmem(); + device_power_up(); local_irq_enable(); return error; } @@ -878,6 +866,7 @@ { int error; local_irq_disable(); + device_power_down(3); /* We'll ignore saved state, but this gets preempt count (etc) right */ save_processor_state(); error = swsusp_arch_resume(); @@ -887,6 +876,7 @@ BUG_ON(!error); restore_processor_state(); restore_highmem(); + device_power_up(); local_irq_enable(); return error; } -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!