From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Subject: Re: Suspend2 merge: 1/51: Device trees
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:53:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041125185304.GA1260@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041125165413.GB476@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
Hi!
> This patch allows the device tree to be split up into multiple trees. I
> don't really expect it to be merged, but it is an important part of
> suspend at the moment, and I certainly want to see something like it
> that will allow us to suspend some parts of the device tree and not
> others. Suspend2 uses it to keep alive the hard drive (or equivalent)
> that we're writing the image to while suspending other devices, thus
> improving the consistency of the image written.
>
> I remember from last time this was posted that someone commented on
> exporting the default device tree; I haven't changed that yet.
Q: I do not understand why you have such strong objections to idea of
selective suspend.
A: Do selective suspend during runtime power managment, that's
okay. But
its useless for suspend-to-disk. (And I do not see how you could use
it for suspend-to-ram, I hope you do not want that).
Lets see, so you suggest to
* SUSPEND all but swap device and parents
* Snapshot
* Write image to disk
* SUSPEND swap device and parents
* Powerdown
Oh no, that does not work, if swap device or its parents uses DMA,
you've corrupted data. You'd have to do
* SUSPEND all but swap device and parents
* FREEZE swap device and parents
* Snapshot
* UNFREEZE swap device and parents
* Write
* SUSPEND swap device and parents
Which means that you still need that FREEZE state, and you get more
complicated code. (And I have not yet introduce details like system
devices).
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-27 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20041125165413.GB476@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
2004-11-25 18:53 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-11-25 22:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-11-25 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2004-11-25 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-11-25 23:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-11-25 23:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-11-26 0:20 ` Pavel Machek
2004-11-27 16:12 ` hugang
2004-11-27 16:13 ` hugang
2004-11-27 16:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-11-24 12:56 Suspend 2 merge Nigel Cunningham
2004-11-24 12:56 ` Suspend2 merge: 1/51: Device trees Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041125185304.GA1260@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome