From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261768AbUK2UTq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:19:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261775AbUK2UTq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:19:46 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:49587 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261768AbUK2UTm (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:19:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:23:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Gerrit Huizenga Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, mason@suse.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 0/10 Class Based Kernel Resource Management Message-Id: <20041129122358.02593a2a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > The following ten patches add the core of CKRM (Class Based Resource > Management) to Linux. How useful is this code at present? What are its limitations? And what is the plan for future enhancements? Thanks.