From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261839AbUK2WfC@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261839AbUK2WfC (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:35:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261834AbUK2Wdf
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:33:35 -0500
Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:6351 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261839AbUK2Wcw (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:32:52 -0500
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:32:51 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
       ckrm-tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 0/10 Class Based Kernel Resource Management
Message-ID: <20041129223251.GA12192@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
	ckrm-tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <E1CYqW1-00056B-00@w-gerrit.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1CYqW1-00056B-00@w-gerrit.beaverton.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by pentafluge.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:44:49AM -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> The following ten patches add the core of CKRM (Class Based Resource
> Management) to Linux.  Current patches are against 2.6.10-rc2.  This
> set of patches is essentailly a cleaned up version of what is
> known on the ckrm-tech@lists.sourcerforge.net as the E16 code base.
> As compared to E16, the patch breakout has been reorganized for easier
> application to mainline with a number of stylistic cleanups more
> in line with mainline kernel code.

And where's the people who wrote the code?  Are people at IBM really
all anxious cowards these days that can't submit their own code but have
to abuse a highlevel manager for it.

I must also say that I'm a bit disappointed by you, Gerrit.  Either you
haven't actually read the code or I vastly overrated your taste.