From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261636AbULBOME (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:12:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261643AbULBOME (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:12:04 -0500 Received: from anor.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.35]:18404 "EHLO anor.ics.muni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261636AbULBOLo (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:11:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:11:32 +0100 From: Jan Kasprzak To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Arnd Bergmann , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cosa.h ioctl numbers Message-ID: <20041202141132.GO11992@fi.muni.cz> References: <20041202124456.GF11992@fi.muni.cz> <200412021358.00844.arnd@arndb.de> <20041202131224.GI11992@fi.muni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 147.251.48.3 X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Schwab wrote: : If you want real compatibility you should use size_t, which is what 2.4 is : effectively using. : I assume that sizeof(struct .. *) == sizeof(size_t) on i386. COSA is an old ISA-based device (out of production now), and I don't think it will be ever used in non-i386 machine. In fact it is the first time someone tried to use it on 2.6 kernel (and thus I had to fix the driver :-). -Yenya -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak | | GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ | > Whatever the Java applications and desktop dances may lead to, Unix will < > still be pushing the packets around for a quite a while. --Rob Pike <