From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261219AbULDHgJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:36:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262484AbULDHgJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:36:09 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:6063 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261219AbULDHgG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:36:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:35:52 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: greg@kroah.com, akpm@osdl.org, chrisw@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maneesh@in.ibm.com, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.10-rc2-bk15] sysfs_dir_close memory leak Message-ID: <20041203233552.K2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <200412040239.iB42dPi12085@adam.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200412040239.iB42dPi12085@adam.yggdrasil.com>; from adam@yggdrasil.com on Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 06:39:25PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Adam J. Richter (adam@yggdrasil.com) wrote: > When we first started using Signed-off-by: lines, I did, > and then somebody commented on it to me in some way that gave me > the impression that the practice was only for people who "approve" > patches, but I'm happy to resume adding Signed-off-by: lines to all > of my patches that are proposed for integration in the future. It's to document the chain. So you, as patch author, should sign off as well as those who "approve" it and send it upstream. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net