From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261194AbULFGai (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:30:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261195AbULFGai (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:30:38 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:49308 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261194AbULFGae (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:30:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:30:14 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Gerrit Huizenga Cc: mef@CS.Princeton.EDU, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, mason@suse.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, llp@CS.Princeton.EDU, acb@CS.Princeton.EDU, mlhuang@CS.Princeton.EDU, smuir@CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 0/10 Class Based Kernel Resource Management Message-Id: <20041205223014.79c9bf16.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20041203164034.2191957c.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > So, Andrew, can you clarify how much we need to put in your hands, how > well tested it needs to be and how clean and current the entire set needs > to be before this is ready for -mm testing? Well we can toss stuff into -mm any old time really. Doing it too early will cause rather a lot of difficulty and churn at both ends - working against -mm can be an extra burden at times. I'd say that it would be best to wait until the code is, in your opinion, in a Linus-mergeable form. Then after one lkml review round and any subsequent rework we should be in good shape.