From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261417AbULEX3z (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:29:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261414AbULEX3z (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:29:55 -0500 Received: from got80-74-137-2.ch-meta.net ([80.74.137.2]:1956 "EHLO gothicus.metanet.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261417AbULEX3w (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:29:52 -0500 From: Thomas Bettler To: Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cpufreq: shouldn't scaling_min_freq be lower? Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:29:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200412052306.07460.bettlert@student.ethz.ch> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412060029.49366.bettlert@student.ethz.ch> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nachricht vom Montag 06 Dezember 2004 00:26: > Thomas Bettler wrote: > > In the beginning there was a Windoze on it. The cpufreq varied from 1800 > > to 120MHz > > Windows tends to use a combination of CPU scaling and throttling to get > the processor that slow. Take a look at > /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling Is there a throttle daemon for Linux? It would be great to use this.