From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261614AbULFTNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261617AbULFTNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:13:49 -0500 Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]:58788 "HELO smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261614AbULFTNn (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:13:43 -0500 From: Blaisorblade To: Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - SYSEMU fixes Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 20:17:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Jeff Dike , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bodo Stroesser References: <200412032145.iB3LjQZW004710@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200412050819.iB58Jlhj006511@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <41B30D6B.3060506@jonmasters.org> In-Reply-To: <41B30D6B.3060506@jonmasters.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412062017.29011.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 05 December 2004 14:30, Jon Masters wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > | jonmasters@gmail.com said: > |>That's great, but do any of these patches address various undefines in > |>arch/um/kernel/process.c:check_sysemu when built without skas? > | Apparently they did. I just checked with skas turned off and got a > successful > | build. They don't - check_sysemu is used also in TT mode. > Good. I've got a working build on an Intel box but it's being more > stubburn building for ppc in 2.6.9 - I'll post an update when I've > actually looked at it. PPC port is not maintained at the moment - there are some rumors of somebody reviving it, but nothing is certain. > |>Also, on 2.6.9, I get dud CFLAGS defined when CONFIG_PROF is set *and* > |>CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is also set - gcc complains about use of "-gp" > |>and "-fomit-frame-pointer" but surely it should be building with frame > |>pointers anyway if I've asked it to do so? I saw that from someone else - I don't remember what was the problem, but it seemed to be some strange kind of .config. Make sure that CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER are both set (the second is the needed one, the first implies the second for UML). "make oldconfig ARCH=um" should fix such problems. > | I just checked with that config, and it builds fine. > Oh good. Then it works now. > Cheers, > Jon. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade