From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262061AbULHH5n (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:57:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262060AbULHH5n (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:57:43 -0500 Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:39182 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262056AbULHH52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:57:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:58:50 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20041208.165850.97660819.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, mitch@sfgoth.com, kernel@linuxace.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix select() for SOCK_RAW sockets (ipv6) From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20041208.023530.26430801.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20041207100140.781f4c00@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@davemloft.net> Organization: USAGI Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20041207104815.3f7a4684.davem@davemloft.net> (at Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:15 -0800), "David S. Miller" says: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:01:40 -0800 > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > Probably, we need to do the same for ipv6, don't we? > > > > diff -Nru a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c > > --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > > +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c 2004-12-07 10:02:50 -08:00 > > @@ -513,6 +513,27 @@ > > We didn't do the "UDP select() fix" on ipv6 because we don't > have the delayed checksumming optimization there. So the > ipv6 side really doesn't need this change. Ok, thanks for the explanation. --yoshfuji @ Strasbourg