From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261623AbULIUzn (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:55:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261621AbULIUzm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:55:42 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:52402 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261617AbULIUz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:55:29 -0500 Message-Id: <200412092055.iB9KtMOb024671@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.1 10/11/2004 with nmh-1.1-RC3 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: initrd and fc3 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:48:05 EST." <200412092048.iB9Km5gq012308@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1102620480.19320.8.camel@rich> <200412092048.iB9Km5gq012308@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1217466558P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:55:19 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1217466558P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:48:05 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said: > (off-list reply) Or it would have been, if I had hit "reply" instead of "reply all". And barring that, it *still* would have been, if I hadn't noticed the cc:, removed it, and then managed to paste it back in again. Argh. Good thing I'm not trying to write code today. :) --==_Exmh_1217466558P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFBuLu2cC3lWbTT17ARAk5VAJ4venOQ7hE5fZn/Xl9qMLQzooSnuwCeKQDb PYsF0Hi9p1uMMSFdc2rsC2M= =rMOp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1217466558P--